Both are, the Anyone who had to do with ideologues dyed in the wool, white smooth nonsense; There is no democratic basis for discussions with the NPD. And the underground argument? Now, look at the discoveries of the last few days. There is a right-wing underground either way. Taxpayers for the Brown still be again now, as well as on the example of the 2003 failed first NPD ban process, the weaknesses of the coming so often as a Garland arguments of the proponents of the ban significantly. Is, first of all, a ban on the NPD not at all to a “sign”, dealing with breach of law, and the Federal Constitutional Court as a prohibited reason will accept only a proven such. Aim is still quite banal, that it cannot be, that the NPD finances itself and their Brown environment – also its beating and murdering part – by taxpayers. And it’s ultimately about one: it goes again to the ratio of the (too) many constitutional protection organs in this country to the object of her investigation of NPD, which temporarily more V-people in the Executive Committee sat as comrades salaried by the protection of the Constitution. Last laugh if you want to take action against these facts, when you are on the other hand not constantly ridicule before administrative courts of NPD cadres due to freedom of Assembly, you must ban the NPD.

With all the consequences that are not pleasant politically for some State Governments, whose Behorden are apparently still blind in the right eye. Just so, if one believes that all normal in the sense of pluralism and worthy, you gotta go as usual. So what does an NPD ban? It decides who laughs last.