The myth of "Punish duplicate content" – one of the biggest obstacles when trying to convince the creators of sites use copying of content. Myth that search engines will punish a site if its most its contents have already found on other sites. Explanation: The penalty for duplicate content does exist – for content that is repeated without any change or with minor changes to pages of the same site. Also there is a punishment for the sites' mirrors, which are almost entirely a repetition of another site. I am writing about how to copy pages on an individual basis rather than en masse, and on many websites. Another explanation: 'punishment' in the search marketing may have a different meaning. "Penalty" means that the search site will punish the website for violating conditions of use of their services.

Under the punishment may be implied decrease the likelihood that a site appears in search results. It may also mean the complete removal of the site from the database (de-indexing). How do I debunked the myth of the "Punishment of the duplicate content"? PageRank. Many thousands sites reprint content and provide content to copy others. The most obvious example – news feeds such as Reuters (PR 8) and the Associated Press (PR 9), which reprints the contents of such sites as (PR 10). The rapid proliferation of sites with unoriginal content. There are already hundreds of sites that deal only with the fact that copying someone else's content – because that is the cheapest and easiest way to attract a lot of traffic, especially from search engines.