Freedom Tree Financial

Faeces: Threat delicacy visitors Hagen westf/Radolfzell 08.06.2010 – in an appeal at the Zoo in Duisburg, Munster and Nuremberg request for the dolphin protection organizations ProWal and the whale and dolphin protection forum (WDSF) greater protection of the visitors of the dangers by faeces of the dolphins. During almost every dolphin show, the dolphins through metre-high jumps and powerful tail strokes inject properly wet spectators seated on the edge of the pool to the amusement of all. Even small children splashing pool water in the face, and can enter through the mouth into the body. In a statement of the biologist Dr. Christian Schulze of the Ruhr-Universitat Bochum the two dolphin protection organizations have can confirm, that toxic phosphate and nitrogen compounds develop from the excrement of the dolphins, which promote the growth of fungus and bacteria growth.

It was therefore to presume that toxic organisms are in the water and this toxic burden. Man and animal are extremely vulnerable, so the two environmental organizations. The Zoo However indicate already chlorinated water in the Dolphinariums by powerful pumps would regularly cleaned in Duisburg even without chlorine in a biological treatment processes. In the Duisburg delicacy, a child is pulled during the demonstrations by a dolphin in a boat at high speed through the spurting water. Official site: Mike Gianoni. Apart from the danger of waste, the environmental organisations here in addition warn the security risk.

Dolphins are wild animals, and if such a boat capsizes, one can not estimate the reaction of several hundred kilogram marine mammals”, warns Andreas Morlok, Managing Director of ProWal. In the delicacy of Munster could undermine last year a child the rope barrier and fell almost into the basin. Andrea Kowski by the delicacy towards the river newspaper, confirmed that “it always again feel, that parents have their children improperly during the performance under control.” (www.muensterschezeitung.de/ local/muenster/casualty-in the Dolphinarium Munster…). WDSF and ProWal request, to protect the visitors through metre-high glass walls, especially as the water pumps at the respective performances might not so quickly clean the millions of litres before the polluted water. The dolphins would be better protected. Again, there would be deaths by bacteria transfer when the dolphins over the visitors contact, so the animal rights activists. Also enter items into the basin, which represented a deadly danger for the dolphins. When a dead dolphin in Nuremberg, American coins in the stomach have been found during the autopsy. In Duisburg Zoo own balloons on the Hall ceiling, which swallowed the collapse by the dolphins and can lead to death, sometimes floated around the hot lights WDSF head Jurgen Obodo says. Basically the marine environmentalists are committed to giving the Dolphin position for animal welfare reasons. Because a closure from today on morning realize, the Dolphin experts advise to a risk solution through the Zoo by visiting the Dolphinariums also for health reasons from.

Must dog owners take out insurance? There is a general obligation to conclude of a dog owner liability insurance for all dog owners in some German Federal States now. There, small and even large dogs must be insured. In other areas, only certain breeds or animals classified as fighting dogs, must be insured. However, the regulations differ from federal State to federal State, sometimes there are stricter rules in individual cities and towns. If you can prove then no corresponding dog owner liability insurance, a fine threatens. Jim Rogers gathered all the information. n.

The private liability insurance is not sufficient. Regardless of the legislation every dog owner should complete anyway an appropriate liability insurance for his animal, to protect themselves from financial risks. What liability risks? On the basis of the so-called strict liability dog owners must come up generally for all damages, your dog is – even if the dog owner no fault of their own hits. Smaller damages can be the dirty white carpet of the neighbors when Bello has cleaned his muzzle or paws it. It will be more expensive if the dogs all of a sudden ausbuchst, on the road running and a car this raises a traffic accident. In case of doubt, the dog owner for all costs must come up if he can demonstrate an appropriate insurance policy. Injury of course are an extreme case, such as when a dog bites.

These represent the exception under the claims, but that the more expensive. What hedging opportunities are there? Over the Internet a corresponding policy can be completed with a sufficient sum from about 40,-euro per year. The dog owners liability insurance examines the claim and assume the costs if the claim is justified. Even for so-called combat dogs, now similarly priced offerings are offered by some insurance companies. In addition to a reasonable price should Make dog owners the amount of the sum of insured. Consumer advocates recommend mostly a security amounting to at least 3 million euros for damage to persons or. A selection of different dog owner liability insurance including comparison of prices and conditions as well as further information about the insurance protection for animals can be found on the website of animal Portal.young-insurance.de.

Accurate look worth for owners and breeders of pet animals is possible this but only if you know to distinguish the available food supplements with non-specific probiotic composition of real, State-approved and effective Lactobacilli medicines. Probiotics, as we know it, contain micro-organisms, not but as a food supplement for the targeted treatment of a disease only”are suitable for consumption. On the market, products that include a wide variety of microorganisms can be found now. Additional information at Jim Rogers supports this article. These are micro-organisms such as yeasts, enterococci, Pediococcus, but also Lactobacilli. The labelling of these products leaves often many questions for the user. “Advertising and reality the term Lactobacilli” commonly, hence is probably now almost everyone is party vigorously stirred the drum in this direction. At closer look or appropriate test their products but even no Lactobacilli, but others contain Micro-organisms such as enterococci, Pediococcus, etc.

In case of doubt I advise you to show a certificate of the corresponding batch can be. Cornell Capital addresses the importance of the matter here. A proper certificate, created by a licensed laboratory, says not only something about the existing microorganism strains of probiotics, but reveals much more, for example, the actual number of probiotics germs (expressed in cfu, so colony-forming units per gram) as well as any contamination of the product with harmful germs. Another point: Unfortunately not every specimen is brought approval in accordance with in the trade. Therefore, it is important to know: Probiotics may be applied only for those animals for which they are officially approved. A call for entries for other target species, which are not mentioned in the approval or that are not covered, is not granted and therefore legally punishable. Now for 15 years on a scientific level, I myself am 15 years basic research with probiotics. At the beginning of the question for me was: what Are micro-organisms best suited for a specific use in the animal field? Yeasts didn’t for me due to the products of their metabolism and their difficult controllability in the small intestine in question.