Freedom Tree Financial

Press censorship in Hungary, nip it in the bud – renewable cash nip it in the bud! The Hungarian right-wing populist party Fidesz has started with its two-thirds majority in the country – in their favor to clean up. Straight times approx. 1,600 people mostly students, demonstrated against a new media law that severely, if not complete, will restrict the freedom of the press in Hungary. (Quote) The Fidesz, Hungary’s new people’s Party, represents right-wing conservative positions on social issues. He stressed in particular pro Church and pro family values here.

Authoritarianism and nationalism is very much anchored in the rhetoric and policy of Fidesz; due to the EU membership of Hungary is expected by observers but a moderation of the nationalism of the party in government responsibility. (Wikipedia) Anyone who believes the last sentence – he is also Salem! On March 30, 1988, before the fall of the wall and the final collapse of the Soviet Union, this party was founded by retry. Co-founder and Chairman of the Fidesz is the Christian, conservative Viktor Orban. 67,88% (two-thirds majority), the right-wing populist, with the help of the financial crisis and catastrophic conditions in the country, won the election in Hungary 2010. With the new Hungarian media authority NMHH the Hungarian President controlled Viktor Orban, since summer 2010 the public radio and television stations in Hungary. The competent body consists entirely of selected Fidesz people.

In the former Hungary at the time of the Soviet Union and still is called such constructions – cliques. Radically and without any qualms the power over the State media, including news agencies (MIT) has taken over Viktor Orban and his right-wing party. All complete and perfect -, the Hungarian President and his Christian conservative cronies have written a media law that will have a significant impact on the freedom of the press in Hungary.

Both are, the Anyone who had to do with ideologues dyed in the wool, white smooth nonsense; There is no democratic basis for discussions with the NPD. And the underground argument? Now, look at the discoveries of the last few days. There is a right-wing underground either way. Taxpayers for the Brown still be again now, as well as on the example of the 2003 failed first NPD ban process, the weaknesses of the coming so often as a Garland arguments of the proponents of the ban significantly. Is, first of all, a ban on the NPD not at all to a “sign”, dealing with breach of law, and the Federal Constitutional Court as a prohibited reason will accept only a proven such. Aim is still quite banal, that it cannot be, that the NPD finances itself and their Brown environment – also its beating and murdering part – by taxpayers. And it’s ultimately about one: it goes again to the ratio of the (too) many constitutional protection organs in this country to the object of her investigation of NPD, which temporarily more V-people in the Executive Committee sat as comrades salaried by the protection of the Constitution. Last laugh if you want to take action against these facts, when you are on the other hand not constantly ridicule before administrative courts of NPD cadres due to freedom of Assembly, you must ban the NPD.

With all the consequences that are not pleasant politically for some State Governments, whose Behorden are apparently still blind in the right eye. Just so, if one believes that all normal in the sense of pluralism and worthy, you gotta go as usual. So what does an NPD ban? It decides who laughs last.